24 Mar Court Says BOP Free From Oversight On Other FSA Incentives
Most of us know about the First Step Act time-credits program, but the FSA also requires that the BOP award prisoners other incentives too.
Most of us know about the First Step Act time-credits program, but the FSA also requires that the BOP award prisoners other incentives too.
With Pell Grant funding set to resume for incarcerated people, the benefits of higher education in prison are as clear as ever.
A bill in Massachusetts would allow prisoners to earn time off their sentence by donating bone marrow or an organ. It's kind of gross.
A federal prisoner wrote a letter to a judge to "keep [the judge] posted on [his] progress in prison. The judge's response? Motion denied.
There are countless obstacles that get in the way of higher education in prison. But two stand out more than the others: fear and politics.
Courts can't order the BOP to award partial eligibility for FSA Time Credits. But that doesn't mean the BOP can't do it anyway.
More people are researching Higher Education in Prison than ever, but Pell Grant funding for incarcerated people remains a mess.
Last Friday, the BOP published a Program Statement that clears up a lot of the confusion around FSA Time Credits. Why did it take so long?
The BOP announced its 18-month FSA time credits rule roughly two months ago. It has already faced and failed its first legal test.
Lallave v. Martinez is a court case on FSA time credits in which a federal judge does something they almost never do: admits his mistake.